
When Apple released the 17" MacBook Pro today, it re-ignited the endless debate on tech sites on the "high price" of this otherwise perfect system. However, Apple's high prices are a thing of the past; today, it is merely a myth (and beaten-to-death discussion point) that Apple overcharges for their machines. Today's discussion left me slightly aggrevated, so I decided to make a case out of it: a price-and-features comparison between Apple's new flagship notebook, the 17" MacBook Pro, and Dell's three close equivalents to it, the Inspiron E1705, the Precision M90 and the Inspiron 9400. Let the battle commence!
As a web professional, I really should be going into things like how Dell's site is much more confusing (and inaccessible) to navigate, how their URI structure is horrible, and how both sites have pretty bad markup. But that's not the issue today, so, these minimal comments aside, I won't discuss them and instead focus on the case.
Something I must note up front is that this comparison is only as close as it gets, which is to say, pretty close. Still, there simply are some differences that can't be changed despite configuration options on either side; some may matter to you, some may not. These differences will be listed at the end, and you can weigh them carefully if you're still on the fence by then.
Originally, I wanted to compare just one Dell notebook to the MacBook Pro, but after traipsing around the Dell site some more, I found that they offer a lot of systems that are more or less the same (bar outer looks), yet have a completely different place according to Dell. Some of them are suited for the Home user, some for the Small Business and others for Medium and Large Businesses. I failed to discover just what made each notebook more or less suited for their respective (suggested) audiences, so I ended up simply taking three of the top systems that seemed to come closest to the MacBook Pro in default configuration.
My activities on the Dell site taught me one thing for sure: Dell is a lot better at marketing themselves as cheap and affordable. The reality is, however, far from it. Sure, they offer truly cheap desktops and notebooks, but a little looking around makes it perfectly clear that those cheap prices are for entirely stripped-off computers with abysmal hardware; suffice to say, not an option for a serious computer user.
The three notebooks I've used for this comparison all feature top of the line hardware, which was a must given that Apple's MacBook Pro is as top of the line as you can get (or at least, as you can get without going totally nuts and spending well over $6000 for a mere notebook). Yet still, Dell's default configurations are deflated in computing power as much as possible, undoubtedly to make the initial price impression that much lower. I won't be fooled, though: what they shave off I add back in, and I'm writing down how much it's going to cost. Just for that alone, I'm glad that Apple keeps things simple: a few configuration options, nothing too complicated or tiresome.
Now, let's get to the overview, the part you've all been waiting for.
As a target set of specifications, I went for the following:
* The Dells don't offer the X1600, so I resorted to lesser videocards, maintaining the 256 MB baseline.
For the Dell notebooks I chose Windows XP Professional, rather than the Home or Media Center versions. This for a very simple reason: in a completely neutral, objective analysis, Mac OS X scores a lot better than XP Home, and only XP Pro comes close to being a competitor in overall features and quality. I felt this to be a justifiable option in the configuration of each Dell notebook. If you want to use XP Home, that's fine. As a counter, I'll point out that you can shave $100 off of the MacBook Pro's default price by configuring the 1GB RAM in two separate DIMMs, rather than one.
Configuration URL's: Inspiron E1705, Precision M90, Inspiron 9400, MacBook Pro.
The results were… well, quite stunning:
At first, I thought I had made some mistakes — maybe I'd accidentally added more than 1GB of RAM — but after doing the entire process twice for each notebook, just to be sure, I realized that I had made no mistakes. All three Dell notebooks are more expensive than the MacBook Pro!
Another myth is that Apple overcharges on their memory prices, but I guess they're not the only one if so. As a quick test, I spec'd each machine with 2GB of RAM instead of the 1GB, and this is the outcome:
For the E1705 and M90 it decreased the gap in price with the MacBook Pro, but for the Inspiron 9400 the difference actually got bigger.
While on Dell's site it seemed I could only get rebate discounts for the E1705, I've heard people mention that through some other sites one could get rebates of near $450 to as much as $650 on some or all Dell computers. Clearly, there's a gray area here on Dell's price end where you could, theoretically, get enough in rebate to make the Dell notebooks cheaper than Apple's MacBook Pro, keyword being theoretically.
But as was mentioned in the introduction, this isn't an Apples-to-Apples comparison. There are pros and cons to each side that may make a big difference to you in all this, and while the comparison is neutral in the specifications department, it's obvious that you buy a computer for your own personal or professional needs. These lists may help you make a choice.
The Dell notebooks
The MacBook Pro
There was a time when people would decide against buying a Mac because they needed or wanted Windows, or because the PC alternatives were cheaper. However, Apple took care of the first argument with Boot Camp and Intel Macs, and this price comparison shows that Apple is all but expensive. Sure, you can get a cheaper Dell notebook, but that's almost like saying you can get a VHS for dirt cheap when we're talking about DVD players.
The real difference between Apple and Dell is not price: Apple simply offers nothing but top of the line hardware, whereas Dell offers everything, from the old and dingy to the shiny and new. However, there are a lot of benefits that come with the MacBook Pro, not in the least the ability to run OS X and Windows together (either via Boot Camp or through Virtualization software).
In the end, I guess it still comes down to your budget and your willingness to buy a top quality computer, or the cheaper mid-range gear. However, I know that I'll be referring people to this article whenever I see or hear them say that Macs are so expensive
.
This article originally published on KuraFire.net.
To play Devil's Advocate, I'm sure that prices in general drop like rocks once you shop around at a 3rd party reseller that you could perhaps buy RAM from without installation for cheaper. That's probably something that should be taken into account when buying any piece of hardware, but the MSRP certainly says a lot when it comes to this sort of debate, especially when considering that direct online retail is generally popular.
Another issue could be that Apple's pro machines are generally stocked fairly generously on their "entry"-level configurations – this recommended Inspiron configuration starts with a 1.66 GHz Core Duo and an integrated Intel GPU, for example. Dell ultimately wins points for having such a wide range of price points and components, but Apple certainly has more consistency and model line differentiation. The laptop battle will only get more interesting when Apple rolls out those MacBooks, which should be delightfully affordable...
Very interesting. I've been thinking about playing around myself just to see what the difference in price between MacIntels and PC's are. Who knows - I may actually have to consider getting Mac the next time I'm looking for a new computer.
Of course the other question is can you get Macs that compare to PC's across the price spectrum. Although Mac's may really be viable alternative at the top end there are plenty of users going I do not need that much computer espcially at that price.
Although Mac's may really be viable alternative at the top end there are plenty of users going I do not need that much computer espcially at that price.
If you don't need a top-end notebook, then take a look at the iBooks. I've had one for over 3 years and it's held up physically, and still runs Photoshop CS like a champ.
iBooks are intended for the "everday" user, and while I agree, I actually used my iBook to sucessfully run my graphic design business... so even though it's marketed as basic, it can do a lot more.
I agree with FDBryant3 that Macs may be better on the top end, but when I was shopping for an affordable desktop a few months ago, Dell had the best deal, even with a 3 year warranty. I'm not a gamer, so a P4 630 3GHz, 1GB RAM, 17" flat panel (admittedly crappy quality, but I use it as my secondary dual monitor) - and several other small add-ons - E510 cost me less than $1100. Can you get close to that with a comparable Mac? Look up RockOfVictor on dslreports for more system specs.
Longer default warranty
I am not sure what you mean be "default," but on most Dell computers if you reduce the warranty to 1 year mail-in, which I think is comparable to Apple's default (correct me if I am wrong), then you can shave off hundreds of dollars off the price for Dell makes a good deal of their money from the warranties. Also for the savvy consumer, do not dismiss the rebates so easily, they do exist quite often (there is always some laptop rebate), and they can shave upwards of $500 dollars off the price if you buy the model the rebate is for. Thus Dell is cheaper for the savvy consumer who is willing to wait upwards of a few months to get the right rebates, or for the consumer who just wants the cheapest unit available.
But of course Apple does have the design edge and "cool" factor now.
The rebates, and they are not even that, most of the time they are instant coupon codes, usually are not found on dell's website itself, but you need to track them on a deal finder website or something similar.
Though this lowers the price of Dell computers, it surely does not add to a pleasant shopping experience for the consumer.
You are buying a piece of hardware that you're going to be using for hours and hours every day. It's way more important to have everything be as perfect as it can be. A few hundred dollars here and there should not matter at all. This is the quality of your working environment and at the end your life you are talking about. How much comfort a hundred saved dollars will give you compared to hundreds of hours of comfortable and stable working environment.
No brainer. Cheap looking, clunky and aged OS on WinDell or sexy, well designed and user friendly OS in an Apple Pro. It's not a price question to me.
But, it's good to know that one doesn't need to pay extra for quality. It's an added bonus. Thanks!
Great article Faruk. Very objective breakdown of the components and pricing. When you compare products that are similar, Apple is very competitive. The only "edge" Dell might have is that they offer many more price levels, including the super-inexpensive crappy $500-$800 laptop level, but if you compare products from Dell and Apple based on specs, you'll generally find Apple is slightly more expensive, but not much.
Besides, who wants an ugly Dell laptop, even if you save a hundred bucks? Apple's industrial design is worth the premium I and others pay. I just don't understand why companies like Dell don't take some inspiration from Apple and design computers that look simple, sleek, and elegant, rather than behemoths with racing stripes down the sides.
I just need the 12" Macbook Pro to come out. Anything bigger than that is a hassle for me to take everywhere with me.
Though I have been using Macintoshes for years now, I hope to make a 12" Macbook Pro (or maybe sans Pro) my first Mac of my very own. I love building my own desktops, but when it comes down to just hardware and its design, I do not think there is a laptop that I would consider purchasing besides a Mac, regardless of price.
I'm going to play devil's advocate here and talk about discounts and coupons.
One of the things that is being overlooked is the discounts that Dell has major discounts available. I realize that Apple has an educational discount that can slightly lower the price of there machines... but Dell constantly has promotional coupons. Don't get me wrong, I'm typing this on a PowerBook G4, and I'm not trying to argue the quality of either the hardware or software, or the aesthetics, just the price. Below is a config of a Dell that was ordered last week with a coupon code I found on notebookreview.com:
Dell Inspiron E1505
--Intel Core Duoprocessor T2500 (2MB/2GHz/667MHz)
--15.4 Inch UltraSharp TrueLife Wide-screen WSXGA+
--1GB, DDR2, 533MHz 2 Dimm
--256MB ATI MOBILITY RADEON X1400
--100GB 5400RPM SATA Hard Drive
--Microsoft Windows XP MCE 2005
--Integrated 10/100 Network Cardand Modem
--8X DVDRW DL Drive
--Intel PRO/Wireless 3945 802.11a/g Mini Card (54Mbps)
--Dell Wireless 350 Bluetooth Module
--85 WHr 9-cell Lithium Ion Battery
--2 Year Limited Warranty
NOTE: This machine has 4 USB 2.0 ports, 1 4-pin Firewire port, and a built in 5-1 Card Reader, but this means that it is 1.44in thick and weights upward of six lbs.
Total Price After Tax and Shipping: $1,400.26
You can't touch a 15in MacBook Pro with similar, albeit more asethetically pleasing, hardware for under $2,200.
One of the things that is being overlooked is the discounts that Dell has major discounts available.
Wow... I'm falling asleep at the keyboard here... I even previewed this and, of course, noticed my error after clicking submit this should read:
"One of the things that is being overlooks is that Dell has major discounts available."
I'm still new to commenting... is there a way to edit your comments after posting of which I am unaware? I couldn't find anything in the FAQ.
Excellent article. As to the comment editing - I believe this is not really a viable option, because one user could edit or delete their comments, and the thread could start to rapidly make no sense at all. A grace period for editing comments could be a good idea, though.
@alexanderj:
Have you ever posted anything on Digg? They use a system similar to what you have just proposed, and it works pretty well, though I think they give a bit too large of a window (like 3 whole minutes).
And I agree that that feature would be a nice addition to Newsvine.
Gosh, I actually haven't posted on Digg ... so much for my idea being original! :) But I think it would help remove the "crap, I messed up that lost post" posts.
Then again, look at Dell as a company. Dell can up their prices because they are a third party distributor. They assemble the computer for you and send it to you able to work. I would bet that it would be cheaper to buy the components separately and not go through Dell.
You can always get something cheaper than a Mac. But you won't get a Mac.
Anyway, those comparisons are kind of pointless to most computer users. They only matter to power users that like to get into that kind of argument.
Most people simply have to use a computer, they're stuck and have to deal with the machine. So, as soon as it can get the job done, it's OK. Now, try to explain to those people that they should shell out hundreds of dollar more for a machine that can get the same job done, they won't get it.
As a Mac user, I believe that, in fact, the job will get done better with a Mac, but that doesn't seem to matter. It always come down to money, and for somebody who doesn't know computer, RAM or HD speed is meaningless, but not a sub-1000$ laptop.
I hate to go off topic, but your name is reading:
Faruk AteÃ?Â?Ã?Â?Ã?Â?Ã?Â?Ã?Â?Ã?Â?Ã?Â?Ã?Â?
Yeah, change your handle dude.
Great article Faruk. It was well thought out and based on factual evidence, a rarity in these types of discussions.
Although I would concede that Dell might not even be playing in the same field for "high-end" hardware as Apple, in an all-things-considered comparison, Dell kills Apple for price. One thing many people may not realize is that if you pay that "list price" for a Dell, you got ripped off, as there are always major coupons available.
One Dell coupon site is . From watching the deals over the past year or so, it seems that Dell probably publishes the coupons to the several coupon sites on a regular basis. I clicked on the current deal that says "$750 off $1999 or more" and was taken to this portal:
From there I clicked on the "Inspiron E1705" and configured it as you did (and even bumped up the screen to compensate for the "cost of color and image quality") and added it to my shopping cart. It turns out, the coupon deal I had clicked through was less of a deal than the Dell default "34%" that I didn't even need a coupon for. It brought this $3044 computer down to $2008, considerably beating the similarly configured MacBook Pro at $2799.
Of course someone will argue that comparing with coupons is not fair, but in reality, Dell's coupon-discounted prices are pretty consistent month-to-month and seem to form their "real prices."
Apple obviously beats Dell for hardware design, and everyone has a price they'll pay for better hardware (if not by specifications, by quality and design), but the main thing I'd like to make sure everyone gets is:
Don't pay list price for Dell computers!
I'll have to agree with you on this. I bought a Dell 700m last year for $1250 after a $750 off $2000 purchase. These coupons are readily available too, and in bulk. I bought mine from eBay for a penny, and there are always coupons available.
I've never seen Apple discount computers other than the education discount, which really is nothing compared to Dell's ridiculous coupons.
My only nitpicky point is that the term "myth" implys that in the past, the prices of Macs were comparable to PC's. That is simply not the case.
However, with the introduction of the Intel based Mac's, the prices have been really inline with their PC counterparts. I'm actually quite impressed with this. It's one of the major factors in my decision to purchase a Mac as my next computer. Microsoft and it's futile attempt at putting out a new OS is another one. :)
Also, thank you very much for actually posting the article here as well as on your site. So few people out here on Newsvine actually do that.
Normally, I try to upgrade our computers with systems that are around $1500. This has been the case in the last two upgrades I have done. If I purchase a Mac (the Intel version of the G5 Tower) next, I'm probably going to be breaking that rule since they are higher end systems. However, I'll be getting two computers in one, so it will be a little easier to justify. Being able to run OS X and Windows on the same box is a real plus here.
You should also consider that in the past Apple used a completely different architecture than PC's. There was a big difference in hardware and what the machines were usually used for (graphics, photo/video editing, 3D modeling). Configuring a PC that could outperform a Mac for those specific tasks would likely have cost more than the Mac.
If the PowerPC architecture, and RISC computing in general, had taken off in a big way with end users, the G4 and G5 processors would probably have been much cheaper. After all, one of RISC's benefits is being cheaper to implement than CISC.
Being able to run OS X and Windows on the same box is a real plus here.
Damn right it is, UNIX and Windows coexisting somewhat peacefully on one sexy-looking machine...
Oh come on now, that's a load of marketing tripe and you know it. The architecture used prior to Intel was no more tuned for graphics/video that my pocket calculator. Mac's have been and always will be popular with the artistic crowd.
The only advantage Mac's had, back in the day, was that Photoshop and other tools like it were developed for the Mac first. This is not the case now.
The only advantage Mac's had, back in the day, was that Photoshop and other tools like it were developed for the Mac first. This is not the case now.
That's not the case now, no, but it was in the past, which is what we were talking about: the past.
And they might have been more tuned. The PowerPC, being a RISC architecture, separated its LOAD and STORE instructions which would reduce the amount of memory transfers compared to the x86 (CISC) method, which included LOAD and STORE within other instructions. I'm no digital-image-processing wiz, so correct me if I'm wrong, but if an individual piece of data will be manipulated repeatedly, leaving it in a register between instructions (RISC) rather than writing out to memory, wiping all registers, and reloading the data (CISC) would be much faster.
I find it interesting how much the price increases if you pick XP Pro over Media Center.
From my own comparisons:
Inspiron E1705 with a 1.83 GHz Core Duo
Total after customization: $2,424
Total with Windows XP Pro: $2,573
With a 2.16 GHz Core Duo
Total: $3,273
With XP Pro: $3,422
Yeah, MS charges an insane amount for their Windows operating systems.
I don't know what else you are adding in there, but the upgrade price is a flat $98. It tells you that right on the customization page. Media Center doesn't cost any more than Home (if MC is even available).
@Andrew Harden:
Did you add the XP Pro as an upgrade through Dell's site ($98), or did you find the difference between the cost of a full copy of XP Pro ($300) and XPMC and add that to the laptop price?
Those were the prices I got from Dell's site by picking XP Pro, not adding it on at the retail price. I did those comparisons several months ago, so things may have changed since then.
I have to admit that I read the title to this post with a wry smile on my face... another Apple enthusiast trying to convince us it's cheaper because you get all this fancy software thrown in... but the article wasn't about software, but about hardware. Then I thought, yes, but this is Apple v Dell in the USA, in Europe the price policies are different.
So, I conducted my own research, using the same criteria Faruk used. And lo and behold, the result was similar. I compared what I would want to buy: the Inspiron 9400 to the Macbook pro 17" with 2 Gb RAM and offset the Radeon X1600 with a 256MB NVIDIA® GeForce™ 7800 Go. I downgraded Dell's standard 3 year warranty to 1 year and matched the other specs. The result: 2,679.44 EUR for the Mac, 2.735,25 EUR for the Inspiron, and that's without the remote that comes with the Mac or the Isight camera. So... you're right! The Mac - even without the extra software - is cheaper than the Dell, as well as (much) more beautiful, lighter and better spec-ed.
I have always used PC laptops, and owned a Dell Inspiron 8600 which I was very happy with until it got stolen recently, necessitating a new machine. I actually bought a Powerbook G4, thinking I should finally switch to those cool, cool Macs after years of resistance (but with Bootcamp, many arguments go out the window), but ended up bringing it back (long story) and started looking for a Sony Vaio. But the combined news of the appearance of the Macbook Pro 17" and this article made me reconsider.... very strongly. So thanks! I have one foot in either camp in this debate, meaning I am tempted by Apple's good looks and specs, but a long-standing PC user and Apple cynic... but one is never too old to learn.
I live in Holland and I did the same comparison for the iBook G4 once. That's a bit more complicated of course, but even for Apple's cheapest notebook the result was similar. If you want a Dell laptop with the battery life and other specs as close to the iBook as possible, you pay about the same.
I live in Holland too ;-)
As a counter, I'll point out that you can shave $100 off of the MacBook Pro's default price by configuring the 1GB RAM in two separate DIMMs, rather than one.
And if you need more than 1 GB RAM, don't buy it from Apple, because what they charge for RAM is absolutely ridiculous.
Does anyone know if upgrading Apple laptops is as easy as upgrading PC laptops (Dell, IBM, etc)? I remember reading a few reviews of the original Titanium Powerbooks that had said that adding an AirPort card in yourself rather than having Apple do it was somewhat difficult (problems with the card not fitting properly, opening the case).
Generally, from what I understand, upgrading the laptop yourself is always a bit trick because everything is just so tight. Apple's cases are always a little tough to open, which can be a challenge in and of itself. I don't know how they've been reconfigured between now and then, but I personally would just as soon take it to an Apple Store or a certified technician and have them do it than attempt it myself.
Airport cards come standard in almost all Apple laptops I believe... And with the newer case designs, upgrading your RAM is pretty straightforward.
This is all good to hear, I was planning on picking up an iBook (or would that be MacBook?) once the Intel models are released.
I own an older iBook G4 (933Mhz) and I installed an AirPort card and RAM and the process took me less than 15 minutes.
I've also helped my father-in-law out with his 15" Powerbook, and it's harder to work with, but still manageable.
If you're looking for a great resource for fixing your Apple notebook, look no further than iFixit
I've used these guides countless times, and they're really in-depth.
One thing: if you want to use WinXP on the Apple, you have to buy that too. That makes the Apple more expensive.
That makes the Apple more expensive.
Not necessarily. You can find OEM versions of XP Pro for around US $100, and some Apple Resellers are even offering to do the install for you.
Is there any difference between an OEM XP disc and a retail XP disc?
Microsoft support is not supplied with an OEM disc. I believe a retail disc comes with so much costumer support provided by Microsoft, while an OEM disc is for companies such as Dell who sell Windows with their computers and can thus support Windows themselves.
You can buy an OEM disc as long as you purchase it with hardware (some retailers count a power or IDE cable as hardware), this is because the OEM is for computer manufacturers to use on new computers and is not intended for retail use.
Back when an apple cost $6000+, i would have agreed that they had cost more. That was over 10 years ago. I am glad someone came out of the windows induced high and put some facts down.
I am glad someone came out of the windows induced high...
I think you mean concussion-induced fog (from banging their heads against the Windows® wall).
students get a 15% discount, though
at my school, we are suppose to get a 10% discount. but even with a student discount, the macbook pro 17" is pricing out via the apple store at $2599 (roughly 7.2%)
Apple Student discounts are not at a set price, but vary for each product.
The last thing I am concerned with is price...
I own a Dell inspiron and a Apple Powerbook and the Dell has had nothing but problems with Windows XP and the hardware.
Never again will I buy a Dell or any other Windows based system... I would rather pay twice as much for a similarly configured Apple that I know will "just work" that to get ripped of by Dell again.
While the initial cost comparison is great, what about the total cost of ownership? How does Apple's customer support stack up next to Dell's? What are the intangible costs of owning an Apple laptop versus a Dell?
Apple does come out with new "Operating Systems" (10.3, 10.4, etc) more often, and charges I believe $79.99 for updates. While Windows gives service packs for free, and the longer Vista is held back, the later the next OS will need to be purchased.
How long does the average Mac user keep their Mac compared to a similar Dell user and their Dell?
Dell's customer support had also been outsourced to India last time I called them. It was sometimes difficult to work through the support personnel's accent, and the overall audio quality seemed fairly low, too.
I don't know how good Apple's support is, though.
The reaction to the support being outsourced to India was extremely negative, and I think I read somewhere that Dell is slowly insoucing back to the US.
Dell's support just plain sucks. I wanted to re-install Windows as one does occasionally and found that the Windows Install program couldn't see my SATA hard drives. I'm not hardware expert, but I have installed Windows several times on various systems and have never come across a problem like it.
After waiting for about 45 minutes on hold, an outsourced support person talked to me and told me that my problem was a software problem and I needed to talk to the software support folks.
After another 45 minutes on hold, I was told I would have to pay $99 to get the support I needed. For installing Windows mind you. Fine, so I talked to the tech in the software group and was told that a setting in the BIOS needed to be changed in order for Windows Install to see the HD's. I made the change and presto, it worked perfectly.
The odd BIOS setting was, I was told, to improve HD performance. I have noticed no loss of performance with the setting the way it is now compared to the way it was from the factory. I get a feeling that this was a ploy to get a bit of extra cash from unsuspecting users.
The next day, I went to Dell's website and used their chat system to see if I could get the charges dropped since the issue was in fact a hardware issue. I talked to "Rocky" and "Uma" and was able to convince them to drop the $99 charge.
So over 3 hours of support conversations and I was able to install Windows which should have worked to begin with.
I can't speak for Apple's support. I haven't owned an Apple computer in well over 15 years minus a short amount of time with a dual G4 back in the OS 9 days.
They have their "Genius Bar" and you can make an appointment to talk to someone there. I actually like that concept. I just don't know how well it actually works.
Overall I like Apple's support. I typically don't like calling ANY support line, but they usually have an answer for me with a quick response time.
As for the Apple retail stores, the Genius Bar is great, and they really know their stuff. Once you sign in you can see your name on a big screen (at least at our Atlanta store) and you can freely wander around until your name is at the top of the list.
And just for reference, both Apple and Dell have support centers in India, whatever that's worth to you.
I have had horrid support from dell. Whenever i call, all i get is
Your call is important to us. {elevator music}You have # people in front of you.{elevator music}...
Apple support, i call, i get what i need right away, i get a person, i am done. I once had a problem with quicktime not recognising my Pro key. Called, got a guy, put me to the higher guy when he couldn't figure it out, and eventually, i got to the top guy in the support, and he looked at the database, and saw the key hadn't set up. All of that happened in the first 10 minutes. Dell, i have spent a whole hour listening to the best Texas music.
Paradox: Think about how many people use PC's to MAC's. now think about the commercials Dell puts on, attracting people who think they can get an amazing computer for 499$. more people use PC's therefore increasing the pool of morons who need Tech support every other day because they washed their PC with soap and water when someone said their desktop was too cluttered and they needed to "clean it up". It's a numbers issue.
...increasing the pool of morons who need Tech support every other day because they washed their PC with soap...
It might be a little unfair to call these folks morons. I think that a lot of people are still weary of computing, and the fact that they can't get some basic setup for $499 makes it seem safer.
I will agree that Dell's target audience are the basic, everyday and first time users out there, and these folks also need the most help.
You don't hear technophiles and IT junkies clamoring on about "I want a Dell soooooo bad!". These guys are buying the high-end stuff (not to say Dell doesn't sell high-end, it's just not they're core).
You read ctrl-alt-del webcomic, dont you.
Why does everyone use Dell's as the comparison between Apple and PC. There are many other vendors out there. I have a Compaq Laptop with XP Pro which is older, but I have had very few problems so far. I had a friend with a Dell laptop, and it always had problems. True, these are isolated experiences, but the Apple MacBook Pro 17" should be compared against the best PC Brand matching laptop period. Go look at Falcon Northwest, Compaq, HP, Alienware, any laptop manufacturer you can find. When I buy a PC, I don't look at just one company, I look at them all. That has been one of the major advantages for PC consumers vs. Apple consumers. Since Apple is the only manufacturer of Apple products, they historically haven't had to compete with PC makers for pricing. This is changing now. Sorry if this comment is a run-on.
I think people choose Dell because Dell is generally known for their cheap PCs, and by showing that a similarly equipped Dell is more expensive than a Mac (at list price) shows that the price argument really no longer applies, and logic would dictate that higher-end machines will be even more expensive. Here I've got a machine from both FalconNorthwest and Alienware, and with similar specs to the MacBook (the new 17" model in this case), the Windows machines come out more expensive (by several hundred dollars, at least) than the MacBook.
Falcon Northwest "FragBook" DR6800
Total: $4,777.61
Alienware Area51 m770
Total:$3,047.00
MacBook Pro 17"
Total: $2,799.00
These comparisons probably aren't fair insofar as the Alienware and the FalconNorthwest both feature faster Pentium 4 64 bit processors.
I think we could compare other PC vendors like Sony, HP, Gateway and Compaq, but Dell is the most popular and the company that is on top right now. There isn't anything to compare a Mac to, except another Mac.
My experience with all PC vendors, especially Dell has been negative. I owned a tower and a notebook, and both of them were unstable at best. Sony, HP/Compaq and Gateway are pretty similar in my opinion, and I've serviced all of those brands at some point or another.
What I really hate about OEM PC manufacturers is that proprietary software that you can get rid of. My cousin has an older HP tower, and every time he reboots all of the "HP Launch Center" comes up. We've been through the registry and can't get the stuff out of there. Even the boot-up screen has a giant HP logo that can't be taken off. I had the same thing with Sony's VIAO line.
At least with a DIY PC you can get rid of that crap. On a Mac, you can change the boot screen, and remove ANY piece of software including iLife... just drag it to the trash.
Andrew: true, the CPU is much faster in those, but wow, does that really justify a $2000 price difference?! I
Not sure, but I think that the Core Duo, even though it has a lower clock rate, is faster than the P4 in the Alienware and Falcon machine clock-for-clock, and definitely in performance-per-watt.
This is not a fair comparison. First of all Core Duo is new technology. All Core Duo notebooks right now are expensive. Dell passes on savings by selling in bulk and offering those rebates. Now heres a real teaser why does a 14-inch Ibook G4 basic configuration with its ancient (sarcasm) G4 processor technology, 512MB RAM, 40 GB and 32MB video cost $1,300? For about the same price you can get a 2ghz Pentium M, 1 GB Ram, 60GB hard drive Dell laptop. Compare prices on the Duo's 3-4 months from now and i'll guarantee Dell will have a better deal.
Compare prices on the Duo's 3-4 months from now and i'll guarantee Dell will have a better deal.
I think you mean "Lower price".
The MacBooks are retailing at almost the exact same price their G4 predecessors were.
The MacBooks are retailing at almost the exact same price their G4 predecessors were.
Your point?
WHOA, stop press, my earlier comment was not right. Actually it turned out I was comparing the price BEFORE VAT on a Mac with the price INCLUDING VAT on the Inspiron. So actually the Dell is cheaper by 500 euros... So I am sorry to say the whole premise of this article does not match my experience, at least in Holland the Dell is MUCH CHEAPER with the same spec!! So, my initial cynicism turned out, unfortunately, to be completely justified. Macs are beautiful, very beautiful, and undoubtedly very good. But the hardware costs A LOT more than a comparable PC.
It depends whether you choose 'Consumer' (adds the VAT at the beginning) or 'Small Business' (adds it at the end). See my below post for a full comparison.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |